Epidural Abscess in the Lumbar Spine: A Single Institution’s Experience With Nonsurgical and Surgical Management

The purpose of this study was to compare patient factors and outcomes in conservatively and surgically treated patients with spinal epidural abscess (SEA). This was a single-center retrospective review of adult patients treated for SEA of the lumbar spine. Primary treatment outcome was readmission for recurrent abscess. Sixty-one patients met inclusion criteria: 59% male, mean age 56.9 years, and body mass index 30.8 kg/m2. Initially 47.5% of patients were treated with conservative measures and 52.5% were treated with surgery. In the conservative group, 31.0% failed treatment and underwent delayed surgery; 26.2% of the overall cohort was readmitted for SEA. Readmitted patients had a greater incidence of history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (p = .048), recurrent infections (p = .008), and recent sepsis and bacteremia (p = .005). Nearly one-third of patients failed initial conservative treatment and needed delayed surgery; however, no significant differences were found between the two treatment groups. Patients with a past history of infections may require more aggressive treatment and closer follow-up, because they are at higher risk for recurrence and readmission. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 28(3):224–231, 2019) Key words: central nervous system infection, conservative management, outcomes, spinal epidural abscess, spinal infection, surgical decompression